Yet, in Auckland, we have decided to build a giant plastic waka for our waterfront. A pre-election bribe to the Maori Party, maybe?
The Government has decided that a repainted crumbling shed, and a giant glass slug (renamed the "cloud" by some clever marketing agency), will simply not be enough to entertain the thousands of rugby fans that are expected to grace our shores. So, they have forked out $2 million on a plastic waka, that in my opinion, would look more appropriate at Rainbows End, or in a Kmart car park.
![]() |
The $2 million plastic waka. Stuff (2011) |
Instead of doing something meaningful, and permanent, we are once again failing to think of anything visionary. Personally, I think that the giant rubber duck used for the new Channel FOUR promotion would add more class to our waterfront than a giant plastic canoe.
![]() |
Channel FOUR's giant inflatable rubber duck. Throng (2011) |
Even this giant lobster might look better.
The Giant Lobster, Kingston S.E, South Australia. Mitchell, S. C (Author) (2009) |
Our waterfront is starting to look like a jigsaw puzzle; one where the pieces do not connect with each other. Its a waste; Auckland's harbour is its most prized natural asset.
If there is one city Auckland should pay attention to, its Sydney (as crass as it may sound).
Sydney has a truly amazing waterfront. Its vibrant, and throbs with soul and energy. It hasn't been ruined by ugly apartments and drinking houses for the liberal elite. It is simply a place for everyone.
The centrepiece of Sydney's waterfront - the Opera House. Mitchell, S. C. (Author) (2008) |
Looking back towards the CBD from the Opera House. Mitchell, S. C (Author) (2008) |
![]() |
The waterfront lit up in the 'Vivid' festival. Clare, D. (2010) |
![]() |
Restaurants and shops alongside the waterfront. Wall, D. (2007) |
It incorporates parks, restaurants, transport facilities, culture and heritage. It flows beautifully too, being extremely pedestrian friendly.
The Royal Botanical Gardens, alongside the harbour's edge. Mitchell, S. C. (Author) (2009) |
Ferries in the harbour. Mitchell, S. C. (Author) (2008) |
Museum of Contemporary Art, on the water's edge. Mitchell, S. C (Author) (2008) |
And its still being developed.
![]() |
Concept plan for Barangaroo. NSW Government (2010). |
This is the concept plan for Barangaroo, currently a large disused wharf that is situated between Darling Harbour and The Rocks. Clearly, it has more vision than what a plastic waka does. Once again, the proposed headland park, beside the proposed buildings, shows that it will be a place that everyone can come to.
Imagine if Auckland had placed its botanic gardens on the waterfront, instead of Manuwera?
If the Government wants to showcase Maori culture, they should direct people to Te Hana, in the north of the region. This is genuine. A plastic waka will be like a 'Dinseyland' interpretation of a Maori community.
So come on Auckland, do something beautiful.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI blogged about this too yesterday. I think it's ridiculous. 2million dollars on a plastic boat?! Quite laughable actually.
ReplyDeleteWho comes up with these stupid ideas anyway? The Cloud and now a plastic waka?? We can't just waste our money on these things when the government is already borrowing 300million a week.
Sorry about the previous post I deleted. Seriously technology has failed me today. :\
Yes I read your blog, Angela. I liked the position you took on the plastic waka.
ReplyDeleteWe must look like an absolute joke on the world stage. You're right - they may as well go and burn $2 million. I don't think we have anyone in government that knows anything about good design. Len Brown seems unusually quiet over this one.
A cloud and a plastic waka? I think its going to look like some sad theme park on the waterfront, or a bunch of crashed alien ships.
Is it realistic to build a permanent iconic building on the Auckland waterfront for the RWC? I agree that we need one at some stage, but it is obviously not feasible at the moment given the timeframes.
ReplyDeletehttp://citysituated.blogspot.com/
No, I think constructing an iconic building is something that should not be rushed. You're right, Mel, it is certainly not feasible at the moment.
ReplyDeleteI do think that the government should stop splashing money at temporary structures. This money could be put aside for something better in the future.
Hopefully the 'cloud' does get dismantled, and something better takes its place in the future.